What is QA Testing?
Foundation of Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance (QA) Testing is the systematic process of ensuring software applications meet specified requirements and function correctly before reaching end users. As a QA professional, you act as the guardian of software quality.
Key Responsibilities
Real-World Impact
Consider major companies like Tesco - their e-commerce platform handles millions of transactions daily. A single bug in their checkout process could cost millions in lost revenue. QA testing prevents such disasters.
Airlines Example - Croatia Airlines
An airline booking system must handle seat selection, payment processing, and passenger data accurately. One bug in the payment gateway could result in double charges or failed bookings, affecting thousands of travelers.
7 Testing Principles
Fundamental concepts every QA should know
1. Testing shows presence of defects
Testing can prove that defects are present, but cannot prove that there are no defects.
2. Exhaustive testing is impossible
Testing everything is not feasible except in trivial cases. Risk analysis and priorities should guide testing efforts.
3. Early testing
Testing activities should start as early as possible in the SDLC and be focused on defined objectives.
4. Defect clustering
A small number of modules contain most of the defects discovered during pre-release testing.
5. Pesticide paradox
If the same tests are repeated, they will no longer find new bugs. Test cases need to be reviewed and updated.
6. Testing is context dependent
Testing is done differently in different contexts. Safety-critical software requires different testing than e-commerce sites.
7. Absence of errors fallacy
Finding and fixing defects does not help if the system built is unusable and does not fulfill user needs.
SDLC - Software Development Life Cycle
Understanding development methodologies
Waterfall Model
Gather and analyze business requirements
System architecture and UI design
Code development phase
QA validation and verification
Release to production
Ongoing support and updates
V-Model (Verification & Validation)
The V-Model emphasizes testing at each development phase, ensuring early defect detection.
Key Benefit: Testing strategies are planned during corresponding development phases, leading to better test coverage and early defect detection.
Agile vs Waterfall Comparison
Waterfall Testing
- • Testing phase starts after development
- • Detailed documentation required
- • Sequential process
- • Less flexibility for changes
- • Good for stable requirements
Agile Testing
- • Testing throughout development cycle
- • Collaborative approach
- • Iterative process
- • High flexibility for changes
- • Continuous feedback
STLC - Software Testing Life Cycle
Systematic approach to testing
Requirement Analysis
Review and understand requirements, identify testable scenarios
Activities:
- • Analyze functional & non-functional requirements
- • Identify test conditions
- • Create Requirement Traceability Matrix (RTM)
Deliverables:
- • RTM document
- • Test Strategy document
- • Automation feasibility report
Test Planning
Define test approach, scope, resources, and timeline
Activities:
- • Define test scope and approach
- • Estimate effort and timeline
- • Identify resources and roles
Deliverables:
- • Test Plan document
- • Test Estimation
- • Resource Planning
Test Case Design & Development
Create detailed test cases and test data
Activities:
- • Create test cases from requirements
- • Develop automation scripts
- • Prepare test data
Deliverables:
- • Test Cases document
- • Test Scripts
- • Test Data sets
Test Environment Setup
Prepare testing environment and test data
Activities:
- • Setup test environment
- • Install required software
- • Configure test data
Deliverables:
- • Environment setup document
- • Test data creation
- • Smoke test results
Test Case Execution
Execute test cases and report defects
Activities:
- • Execute test cases
- • Log defects in bug tracking tool
- • Retest fixed defects
Deliverables:
- • Test execution results
- • Defect reports
- • Test logs
Test Reporting
Analyze results and create test summary report
Activities:
- • Evaluate test completion criteria
- • Analyze metrics and coverage
- • Prepare final report
Deliverables:
- • Test summary report
- • Test metrics
- • Test coverage report
Test Closure
Document lessons learned and archive test artifacts
Activities:
- • Document lessons learned
- • Archive test artifacts
- • Analyze process improvements
Deliverables:
- • Test closure report
- • Best practices document
- • Test artifacts archive
Testing Levels
Different levels of software testing
Testing Pyramid
The testing pyramid shows the ideal distribution of different types of tests in a software project. More tests at the bottom (unit tests) and fewer at the top (UI tests).
1. Unit Testing
Testing individual components or modules in isolation. The smallest testable parts of an application.
Login Page Example:
Characteristics:
- • Tests individual functions/methods
- • Fast execution (milliseconds)
- • Easy to write and maintain
- • High code coverage possible
- • Done by developers
- • Uses mocks/stubs for dependencies
2. Integration Testing
Testing the interfaces and interaction between integrated components or systems.
Integration Example:
Test: Login form communicates with user database
3. System Testing
Testing the complete integrated system to verify it meets specified requirements.
System Test Areas:
- • Functionality: All features work correctly
- • Reliability: System stability over time
- • Performance: Speed and responsiveness
- • Security: Data protection and access control
4. User Acceptance Testing (UAT)
Final testing performed by end users to ensure the system meets business requirements.
Alpha Testing:
- • Performed by internal users/employees
- • Controlled environment
- • Before beta testing
Beta Testing:
- • Performed by external users
- • Real-world environment
- • Limited user group
V-Model (Verification & Validation)
Testing throughout the development lifecycle
What is the V-Model?
The V-Model is an extension of the waterfall model where testing activities are planned in parallel with corresponding development phases. Each development phase has a corresponding testing phase.
Verification (Left Side):
- • Static testing activities
- • Reviews and walkthroughs
- • Document analysis
- • "Are we building the product right?"
Validation (Right Side):
- • Dynamic testing activities
- • Actual test execution
- • Code execution with test data
- • "Are we building the right product?"
V-Model Phase Mapping
Gather business requirements
Validate user requirements
High-level architecture
Test complete system
Module-level design
Test module interactions
Implementation phase
Test individual modules
V-Model Benefits
✓ Advantages:
- • Early test planning and design
- • Better defect prevention
- • Clear testing objectives
- • Higher quality deliverables
✗ Disadvantages:
- • Rigid and less flexible
- • Difficult to accommodate changes
- • No early prototypes
- • High risk for complex projects
Static vs Dynamic Testing
Two fundamental approaches to testing
Static Testing
Testing without executing the code. Reviews, walkthroughs, and analysis.
Methods:
- • Code Reviews - Peer review of source code
- • Walkthroughs - Author explains code to team
- • Inspections - Formal defect detection process
- • Static Analysis Tools - Automated code analysis
Benefits:
- • Early defect detection
- • Cost-effective bug prevention
- • Improves code quality
- • Knowledge sharing
Real Example:
Reviewing login page HTML/CSS for accessibility issues, checking if proper form labels are used for screen readers.
Dynamic Testing
Testing by executing the code with various inputs and checking outputs.
Types:
- • Functional Testing - Testing features work correctly
- • Performance Testing - Speed, load, stress testing
- • Security Testing - Vulnerability assessment
- • Usability Testing - User experience validation
Characteristics:
- • Requires test environment
- • Uses test data
- • Validates actual behavior
- • Can be automated
Real Example:
Actually filling out and submitting a login form with different username/password combinations to test authentication logic.
Static vs Dynamic Comparison
Aspect | Static Testing | Dynamic Testing |
---|---|---|
Code Execution | No code execution | Code is executed |
When Applied | Early development phases | After code completion |
Cost | Lower cost | Higher cost |
Defect Types | Logic errors, syntax issues | Runtime errors, performance issues |
Manual vs Automation Testing
Choosing the right approach for different scenarios
Manual Testing
Human testers manually execute test cases without automation tools.
✓ Best For:
- • Exploratory testing
- • Usability testing
- • Ad-hoc testing
- • New feature testing
- • UI/UX validation
✗ Limitations:
- • Time-consuming for repetitive tasks
- • Human error prone
- • Not suitable for load testing
- • Resource intensive
Example Scenario:
Testing a new checkout flow for Tesco's website - checking if the payment process feels intuitive and secure to users.
Automation Testing
Using tools and scripts to execute tests automatically without human intervention.
✓ Best For:
- • Regression testing
- • Performance testing
- • Repetitive test cases
- • Data-driven testing
- • Cross-browser testing
✗ Limitations:
- • High initial setup cost
- • Maintenance overhead
- • Cannot test user experience
- • Requires technical skills
Example Scenario:
Running 500 login test cases overnight to verify authentication works across different browsers and user types.
Decision Matrix: When to Use What
Use Manual Testing When:
- • Testing new features for first time
- • Exploring application behavior
- • Checking visual elements
- • Testing user workflows
- • Performing accessibility testing
Use Automation When:
- • Tests need to run repeatedly
- • Testing across multiple environments
- • Performing load/stress testing
- • Running smoke tests
- • Doing regression testing
Hybrid Approach:
- • Automate stable, repetitive tests
- • Manual testing for new features
- • Use both for comprehensive coverage
- • Start manual, automate over time
- • Focus automation on critical paths
Functional Testing
Testing what the system does
What is Functional Testing?
Functional testing verifies that each function of the software application operates according to the requirement specification. It focuses on testing the functionality of the system.
Key Characteristics:
- • Based on functional requirements
- • Black box testing technique
- • Validates business logic
- • User-centric approach
- • Input-output behavior verification
Testing Focus Areas:
- • User interface functionality
- • Database operations
- • API functionality
- • Security features
- • Business workflow validation
Types of Functional Testing
Unit Testing
Testing individual components or modules in isolation.
Example - Login Function:
Test Cases:
- • Empty username → false
- • Empty password → false
- • Valid credentials → true
- • Invalid credentials → false
Integration Testing
Testing interaction between integrated modules.
Big Bang Approach:
All modules integrated simultaneously and tested as a whole.
Incremental Approach:
Modules integrated one by one and tested at each step.
System Testing
Testing the complete integrated system to verify it meets specified requirements.
Real-World Example: Airlines Booking System
Flight Search
- • Search by destination
- • Filter by price/time
- • Display available seats
Booking Process
- • Seat selection
- • Passenger details
- • Payment processing
Confirmation
- • Booking confirmation
- • Email ticket
- • SMS notification
User Acceptance Testing (UAT)
Final testing performed by end users to ensure the system meets business requirements.
Alpha Testing:
Internal testing by organization's employees.
Beta Testing:
Testing by limited external users in real environment.
Sample Functional Test Case
Test Case: User Registration
Test ID: | TC_REG_001 |
Objective: | Verify user can register successfully |
Precondition: | User not registered before |
Priority: | High |
Test Steps & Expected Results
Expected: Registration form displayed
Expected: Success message shown
Expected: Confirmation email received
Testing Techniques
White-box testing methods and coverage techniques
White Box Testing Techniques
White box testing techniques focus on the internal structure of the code. These techniques help ensure thorough testing coverage by examining different aspects of code execution.
Code Coverage Formula:
Statement Coverage
Ensures that every executable statement in the code is executed at least once during testing.
Example:
Test cases: validateAge(20) and validateAge(15) achieve 100% statement coverage
Branch Coverage
Ensures that every branch (true/false) of every decision point is executed at least once.
Example:
Need tests for both true and false branches of the condition
Condition Coverage
Ensures that each boolean sub-expression has been evaluated to both true and false.
Test Requirements:
- • Each condition must be tested as true
- • Each condition must be tested as false
- • More thorough than branch coverage
- • May require multiple test cases
Loop Testing
Focuses on testing the validity of loop constructs. Different strategies for different loop types.
Simple Loops:
- • Skip the loop entirely (n=0)
- • Only one pass (n=1)
- • Two passes (n=2)
- • m passes (n=m, typical value)
- • n-1, n, n+1 passes
Nested Loops:
- • Start with innermost loop
- • Set outer loops to minimum
- • Test innermost with simple loop strategy
- • Work outward
- • Continue until all tested
Concatenated Loops:
- • Independent loops: test separately
- • Dependent loops: test as nested
- • Check loop counter dependencies
- • Verify data flow between loops
Loop Testing Example:
- • sumArray([]) - Zero iterations
- • sumArray([5]) - One iteration
- • sumArray([1,2]) - Two iterations
- • sumArray([1,2,3,4,5]) - Multiple iterations
Path Testing
Tests all possible paths through the code using cyclomatic complexity.
Cyclomatic Complexity:
This determines the minimum number of test cases needed for path coverage
Coverage Techniques Comparison
Technique | What it Covers | Strength | Weakness |
---|---|---|---|
Statement | Every executable statement | Easy to measure | Weakest form of coverage |
Branch | Every decision outcome | Better than statement | Doesn't test all conditions |
Condition | Every boolean condition | Tests individual conditions | May miss some decision outcomes |
Path | Every possible execution path | Most thorough | Can be impractical for complex code |
Testing Techniques Best Practices
✓ Recommendations:
- • Start with statement coverage as minimum
- • Aim for 100% branch coverage
- • Use condition coverage for complex logic
- • Apply loop testing for all loop constructs
- • Consider path testing for critical modules
- • Use tools to measure coverage automatically
Coverage Goals:
- • Critical systems: 100% branch coverage
- • Commercial software: 80-90% coverage
- • Web applications: 70-80% coverage
- • Prototypes: 60-70% coverage
- • Focus on quality over quantity
- • Combine with black-box techniques
Performance Testing
Comprehensive performance testing strategies
Load Testing
Testing system behavior under expected normal load conditions.
Typical Load Metrics:
Stress Testing
Testing system behavior beyond normal capacity to find the breaking point.
Stress Progression:
Volume Testing
Testing system performance with large amounts of data.
Volume Test Scenarios:
- • Database with 10 million records
- • File processing of 4GB+ files
- • Memory usage with large datasets
- • Network bandwidth utilization
Performance Benchmarks
Web Applications:
- • Page Load: < 3 seconds
- • API Response: < 200ms
- • Database Query: < 100ms
Mobile Apps:
- • App Launch: < 2 seconds
- • Screen Transition: < 1 second
- • Data Sync: < 5 seconds
Enterprise Systems:
- • Transaction: < 500ms
- • Report Generation: < 30 sec
- • System Availability: 99.9%
Non-Functional Testing
Testing how the system performs
What is Non-Functional Testing?
Non-functional testing evaluates the performance, usability, reliability, and other quality aspects of the software. It focuses on HOW the system performs rather than WHAT it does.
Performance Metrics:
- • Response time
- • Throughput
- • Resource utilization
- • Scalability
Quality Attributes:
- • Usability
- • Reliability
- • Security
- • Compatibility
Environmental:
- • Cross-browser testing
- • Mobile responsiveness
- • Network conditions
- • Device compatibility
Performance Testing Types
Load Testing
Testing system behavior under normal expected load conditions.
Objectives:
- • Verify response time requirements
- • Ensure system stability
- • Validate throughput expectations
- • Identify performance bottlenecks
Real Example - Tesco Online:
Normal Load: 10,000 concurrent users
Expected Response: Page load < 3 seconds
Transactions: 500 orders per minute
Stress Testing
Testing system behavior beyond normal capacity to find breaking point.
Airlines Example - Croatia Airlines During Holiday Rush:
Normal Load
2,000 users booking flights simultaneously
Stress Load
15,000 users during Christmas booking rush
Breaking Point
System fails at 20,000+ concurrent users
Goal: Ensure graceful degradation - system should slow down but not crash completely.
Volume Testing
Testing system with large amounts of data to verify performance and stability.
Database Testing Example:
Test Scenarios:
- • 10 million customer records
- • 100 million transaction history
- • 50GB product catalog
- • 1TB of user-generated content
Validation Points:
- • Search response time remains < 2s
- • Database queries don't timeout
- • Memory usage stays within limits
- • Data integrity maintained
Spike Testing
Testing system behavior under sudden, extreme load increases.
Black Friday Example - E-commerce Site:
Security Testing
Common Tests:
- • SQL Injection attacks
- • Cross-site scripting (XSS)
- • Authentication bypass
- • Session management
- • Data encryption validation
' OR '1'='1
Usability Testing
Evaluation Criteria:
- • Ease of navigation
- • User interface clarity
- • Task completion time
- • Error prevention
- • User satisfaction
Compatibility Testing
Testing Matrix:
- • Chrome 120+
- • Firefox 115+
- • Safari 16+
- • Edge 110+
- • iPhone 12+
- • Samsung Galaxy
- • iPad Pro
- • Desktop 1920x1080
Reliability Testing
Metrics:
- • MTBF: Mean Time Between Failures
- • MTTR: Mean Time To Recovery
- • Availability: 99.9% uptime target
- • Failure Rate: < 0.1% transactions
Black Box vs White Box Testing
Testing approaches based on code knowledge
Black Box Testing
Testing without knowledge of internal code structure. Focus on inputs and outputs.
Techniques:
- • Equivalence Partitioning - Group similar inputs
- • Boundary Value Analysis - Test edge values
- • Decision Table Testing - Test business rules
- • State Transition Testing - Test state changes
Example - Login Form:
Real-World Use:
Testing Croatia Airlines booking system by trying different passenger counts, dates, and destinations without knowing the backend database structure.
White Box Testing
Testing with full knowledge of internal code structure, logic, and design.
Techniques:
- • Statement Coverage - Execute every code line
- • Branch Coverage - Test all if/else paths
- • Path Coverage - Test all possible paths
- • Condition Coverage - Test all conditions
Code Example:
Test cases: valid+active user, valid+inactive user, invalid user
Real-World Use:
Unit testing payment processing code to ensure all branches (successful payment, insufficient funds, network timeout) are properly tested.
Gray Box Testing (Hybrid Approach)
Combination of black box and white box testing - limited knowledge of internal workings.
Characteristics:
- • Partial code knowledge
- • Access to design documents
- • Integration testing focus
- • API testing
Best For:
- • Integration testing
- • Penetration testing
- • Matrix testing
- • Regression testing
Example:
Testing API endpoints for e-commerce cart - knowing the API structure but not the internal database queries.
Bug Reporting
Effective defect identification and documentation
What is a Bug?
A bug (or defect) is a flaw in a software system that causes it to behave in an unintended or unexpected way. It represents a deviation from the expected functionality as defined in the requirements.
Types of Bugs:
- • Functional bugs
- • Performance issues
- • UI/UX problems
- • Security vulnerabilities
- • Compatibility issues
- • Data corruption
Common Causes:
- • Coding errors
- • Requirement misunderstanding
- • Design flaws
- • Integration issues
- • Environmental factors
- • Human mistakes
Impact Areas:
- • User experience
- • System performance
- • Data integrity
- • Business operations
- • Security risks
- • Financial losses
Bug Lifecycle
Bug Status Flow
New
Bug discovered and reported
Assigned
Assigned to developer for fixing
Fixed
Developer has resolved the issue
Closed
Bug verified as fixed and closed
Priority vs Severity
Severity
Impact on system functionality - How much the bug affects the system's operation.
Priority
Urgency of fixing - How quickly the bug needs to be resolved based on business needs.
Example Scenarios:
Modern Bug Report Template
Bug Report #BUG-001
Created on Loading...
Bug Reporting Best Practices
✓ Do's:
- • Write clear, descriptive titles
- • Provide detailed steps to reproduce
- • Include screenshots/videos
- • Specify environment details
- • Set appropriate priority and severity
- • Test on multiple environments
- • Verify bug before reporting
✗ Don'ts:
- • Don't use vague descriptions
- • Don't report duplicate bugs
- • Don't skip reproduction steps
- • Don't assume everyone knows the context
- • Don't report multiple issues in one bug
- • Don't forget to include evidence
- • Don't set wrong priority/severity
Test Case Writing
Creating effective test cases
Test Case Structure
Essential Components:
- Test Case ID: Unique identifier (TC_001)
- Test Case Title: Clear, descriptive name
- Objective: What you're testing
- Preconditions: Setup requirements
- Test Steps: Detailed actions
- Expected Results: What should happen
- Postconditions: Cleanup steps
Test Case Attributes:
- Priority: High/Medium/Low
- Test Type: Functional/Non-functional
- Test Level: Unit/Integration/System
- Test Data: Required input data
- Environment: Test environment details
- Author: Test case creator
- Creation Date: When created
- Execution Status: Pass/Fail/Blocked
Sample Test Case: User Login
Test Case ID: | TC_LOGIN_001 |
Title: | Verify successful login with valid credentials |
Objective: | Test login functionality with correct username and password |
Priority: | High |
Precondition: | User has valid account, browser is open |
Test Data: | Username: testuser@example.com Password: Test123! |
Test Steps & Expected Results:
Expected: Login form is displayed with username and password fields
Expected: Username is entered successfully
Expected: Password is masked and entered successfully
Expected: User is redirected to dashboard page
Expected: User profile/logout option is visible
Test Execution Results
PASSED
Definition: Test executed successfully and met all expected results
Action: Mark as passed, move to next test case
Documentation: Record execution date and tester name
FAILED
Definition: Test did not meet expected results, defect found
Action: Create bug report, assign to development team
Documentation: Record failure details and attach evidence
BLOCKED
Definition: Test cannot be executed due to external factors
Action: Identify and resolve blocking issue
Documentation: Record reason for blocking and resolution steps
Test Case Writing Best Practices
✓ Do's:
- • Write clear, concise test steps
- • Use simple language
- • Include specific test data
- • Make test cases independent
- • Cover both positive and negative scenarios
- • Review and update regularly
✗ Don'ts:
- • Don't write vague or ambiguous steps
- • Don't assume prior knowledge
- • Don't create dependent test cases
- • Don't skip expected results
- • Don't use complex technical jargon
- • Don't forget to specify test data
Regression Testing
Ensuring new changes don't break existing functionality
What is Regression Testing?
Regression testing is the process of testing existing software functionality to ensure that new code changes, bug fixes, or new features haven't negatively impacted the existing working features.
Key Objectives:
- • Verify existing functionality still works
- • Ensure new changes don't introduce bugs
- • Maintain software quality and stability
- • Validate system integration after changes
- • Confirm bug fixes don't create new issues
When to Perform:
- • After bug fixes
- • After new feature implementation
- • After code refactoring
- • Before major releases
- • After environment changes
Types of Regression Testing
Complete Regression Testing
Testing the entire application from scratch when major changes are made.
When to Use:
- • Major system updates
- • Architecture changes
- • Multiple bug fixes
- • Before major releases
Characteristics:
- • Time-consuming
- • Resource intensive
- • Comprehensive coverage
- • High confidence level
Partial Regression Testing
Testing only the affected modules and their related functionalities.
When to Use:
- • Minor bug fixes
- • Small feature additions
- • Localized changes
- • Quick releases
Characteristics:
- • Faster execution
- • Cost-effective
- • Focused testing
- • Risk-based approach
Selective Regression Testing
Testing selected test cases based on code changes and impact analysis.
Selection Criteria:
High Priority:
- • Critical business functions
- • Recently modified areas
- • Integration points
Medium Priority:
- • Related functionalities
- • Common user workflows
- • Previously failed areas
Low Priority:
- • Stable, unchanged features
- • Non-critical functions
- • Rarely used features
Regression Testing Process
Impact Analysis
Analyze code changes to identify affected areas and dependencies
Test Case Selection
Choose appropriate test cases based on impact analysis and risk assessment
Test Execution
Execute selected test cases and document results
Result Analysis
Analyze test results and report any new defects or regressions
Real-World Example: E-commerce Website
Scenario:
A bug was fixed in the payment processing module where credit card validation was failing for certain card types.
Regression Test Areas:
Direct Impact:
- • Payment processing with all card types
- • Credit card validation logic
- • Payment confirmation flow
- • Error handling for invalid cards
Indirect Impact:
- • Order completion process
- • Shopping cart functionality
- • User account updates
- • Email notifications
Test Cases to Execute:
- • Verify payment with Visa, MasterCard, American Express
- • Test payment with invalid card numbers
- • Verify order completion after successful payment
- • Test shopping cart persistence during payment
- • Verify email confirmations are sent
Regression Testing Best Practices
✓ Best Practices:
- • Automate repetitive regression tests
- • Maintain a regression test suite
- • Prioritize test cases by risk and impact
- • Update test cases regularly
- • Use version control for test cases
- • Document test results thoroughly
✗ Common Pitfalls:
- • Testing everything without prioritization
- • Ignoring impact analysis
- • Using outdated test cases
- • Not automating stable test cases
- • Insufficient test coverage
- • Poor communication with development team
Smoke Testing
Basic functionality verification
What is Smoke Testing?
Smoke testing is a preliminary testing approach that verifies the basic functionality of an application to ensure it's stable enough for further detailed testing. It's also known as "Build Verification Testing."
Key Characteristics:
- • Quick and shallow testing
- • Tests critical functionalities only
- • Performed after new build deployment
- • Determines if build is stable for testing
- • Usually automated
- • Takes 30 minutes to 2 hours
Purpose:
- • Verify application launches successfully
- • Check critical paths work
- • Ensure basic functionality is intact
- • Save time by catching major issues early
- • Decide if detailed testing should proceed
Smoke Testing Process
Step 1: Build Deployment
New build is deployed to the test environment
Activities:
- • Deploy latest build to test environment
- • Verify deployment was successful
- • Check application starts without errors
- • Confirm environment setup is correct
Step 2: Execute Smoke Tests
Run predefined smoke test cases covering critical functionality
Test Areas:
- • Application login/authentication
- • Main navigation and menus
- • Core business functions
- • Database connectivity
- • API endpoints (if applicable)
- • File upload/download
- • Search functionality
- • Basic CRUD operations
Step 3: Analyze Results
Evaluate test results and make go/no-go decision
✓ PASS
All critical functions work. Proceed with detailed testing.
✗ FAIL
Critical issues found. Reject build and return to development.
⚠ CONDITIONAL
Minor issues found. Proceed with caution or fix first.
Sample Smoke Test Cases: E-commerce Website
Critical Path Test Cases:
User Authentication:
- • TC_001: Verify application loads successfully
- • TC_002: Verify user can login with valid credentials
- • TC_003: Verify user can logout successfully
- • TC_004: Verify registration page loads
Core Functionality:
- • TC_005: Verify product catalog loads
- • TC_006: Verify search functionality works
- • TC_007: Verify add to cart function
- • TC_008: Verify checkout process starts
Sample Test Case Detail:
Title: Verify User Login
Priority: Critical
Estimated Time: 2 minutes
1. Open application URL
2. Click Login button
3. Enter valid credentials
4. Click Submit
Expected: User successfully logged in
Smoke vs Sanity vs Regression Testing
Aspect | Smoke Testing | Sanity Testing | Regression Testing |
---|---|---|---|
Purpose | Verify build stability | Verify specific functionality | Verify existing features work |
Scope | Broad but shallow | Narrow but deep | Broad and deep |
When Performed | After new build | After minor changes | After any changes |
Time Required | 30 min - 2 hours | 1-3 hours | Several hours to days |
Automation | Usually automated | Can be manual or automated | Preferably automated |
Smoke Testing Best Practices
✓ Do's:
- • Keep test cases simple and focused
- • Automate smoke tests for efficiency
- • Include only critical functionalities
- • Run smoke tests before detailed testing
- • Document clear pass/fail criteria
- • Update smoke tests with new features
✗ Don'ts:
- • Don't include detailed test scenarios
- • Don't test edge cases or negative scenarios
- • Don't spend too much time on smoke testing
- • Don't ignore smoke test failures
- • Don't make smoke tests too complex
- • Don't skip smoke testing for urgent releases
Real-World Scenario: Banking Application
Situation:
New build of online banking application deployed to test environment after adding mobile payment feature.
Smoke Test Results:
✓ Passed:
- • Application loads
- • User login works
- • Account balance displays
- • Navigation functions
✗ Failed:
- • Money transfer crashes
- • Transaction history empty
Decision:
Build rejected. Critical functionality broken. Return to development for fixes.
Cypress Automation Testing
Modern end-to-end testing framework for web applications
What is Cypress?
Cypress is a next-generation front-end testing tool built for the modern web. It enables you to write, run, and debug tests directly in the browser with real-time reloads and time-travel debugging capabilities.
Key Features:
- • Real-time browser testing
- • Automatic waiting and retries
- • Time-travel debugging
- • Network traffic control
- • Screenshots and videos
- • Easy setup and configuration
Advantages:
- • Fast test execution
- • Developer-friendly syntax
- • Excellent debugging capabilities
- • Built-in assertions
- • No WebDriver needed
- • Great documentation
Use Cases:
- • End-to-end testing
- • Integration testing
- • Unit testing
- • API testing
- • Visual regression testing
- • Component testing
Getting Started: Installation & Setup
Step 1: Install Cypress
Step 2: Open Cypress Test Runner
Your First Cypress Test
Example: Login Test
Essential Cypress Commands
Navigation & Interaction
Assertions & Verification
Learning Resources
📺 Video Tutorial
Comprehensive Cypress Tutorial
Complete guide covering installation, basic commands, advanced features, and best practices.
Watch Tutorial on YouTube📚 Official Documentation
Cypress Official Docs
Comprehensive documentation with examples, API reference, and guides for all Cypress features.
Visit Cypress Documentation🎯 Learning Path Recommendation
- Start with the official Cypress documentation to understand core concepts
- Follow the YouTube tutorial for hands-on practice
- Practice with simple tests on your own projects
- Explore advanced features like custom commands and API testing
- Learn about CI/CD integration and best practices
- Join the Cypress community for ongoing support and learning